I’m still nursing a sore back. slowly working away at one thing or another. Past couple of days it’s been the next set of drawings for this project – https://pfollansbee.wordpress.com/2020/06/17/working-on-drawings/
(Yes, I know the first set’s not ready yet, but I have to do something…)
Over the years, there are some things that I just won’t bother carving. This chest of mine is an example –
I copied the two panels and wide muntin as closely as I could from an original I measured 20 years ago. But the bottom rail is made up from related works. Here’s the bottom rail from the original:

It’s clearly accomplished carving, all those curves flow nicely, nothing too abrupt to jar the eye. But it’s so boring. No background, no shaping. Just the repeating leaf-shapes. So I’ve never carved that pattern – and it appears again & again in the overall works. Here it is on one of the New England examples, running up the stiles also. I guess the only way I’d bother with this pattern is if I were hired to copy verbatim an existing work with it.
here’s a variation, with an extra outline and some textured punch work where you might remove background otherwise. This one’s a vertical muntin.

A student at Lost Art Press last fall showed me these photos taken from the web – I had never seen this chest before. I really liked that center panel, but the bottom rail is a dud.
One I have tinkered with a number of times is sort of in between. Here’s an original example, a muntin from a chest in Darlington, Devon.
And a chest at Wadsworth Atheneum in Hartford, Connecticut. Made in Ipswich, MA. Both stiles, top rail & both muntins use this pattern.
Below I cropped the top rail from that photo – not sure it will come through in detail.
A drawing I did of that pattern a couple of years ago. Either mine, or the original, is upside-down. I’ve seen it carved both ways.
This pattern is a bit hard to wrap my head around. I broke it down to three elements, (here in black, green & blue) and then these just lay against each other as the pattern repeats. (my full drawing above is 2 1/3 repeats).
It’s a weird one. I’ve only carved it a few times –


Most recently I carved this design when I built the shop in 2016. Did it twice then, because this one’s on the wrong side of the brace, now covered with sheathing for a few decades.
So keep in mind that my “take” on these Devon, England/Ipswich, Massachusetts carvings are skewed. I take what I need, and leave the rest.
What would be appropriate in 17th c Maryland?
What designs would be appropriate in 17th c Maryland?
I don’t really know. It’s been ages & ages since I looked at anything to do with Maryland. A different settlement pattern from New England as I recall. Afraid I can’t help you…
Thank you, Peter. GP
Thanks Peter I never heard of JSTOR and now Im hooked. Seems like its one of the better info sites similar to Archive.org Thanks again, keep up GRATE work and hope you and family are happy and healthy.
oh, nice pattern, will check out the other side of the brace more closely–hope back gets better–remember: heat then ice–
[…] Read The Entire Article By pfollansbee Here. […]
But they should never have taken the very best…